Essay
Generative AI Optimises for the Statistical Average
Convenience removes the need to practise small habits. AI may be the next step in that quiet trade-off.
My mom used to say: “Anything in excess is poison.”
I didn’t think much of it when I was younger.
But over time, I started noticing something.
I used to remember phone numbers.
I used to do quick mental math.
I used to sit with problems longer before reaching for help.
Then smartphones arrived.
They didn’t make me less intelligent.
They simply removed the need to practice those small habits.
Now I see a similar shift happening again.
At a workshop recently, a speaker said something that stayed with me:
“Generative AI optimizes for the statistical average.”
Whether taken literally or not, the idea made me pause.
Because LLMs are incredibly powerful.
They can retrieve, summarize, connect, and generate at a speed no human can match.
But every powerful tool changes what we practice.
Calculators changed arithmetic.
GPS changed navigation.
Search engines changed memorization.

So the question becomes:
What will LLMs change in us?
The more I use them, the more I notice a subtle shift.
I reach for answers faster than I sit with questions.
I sometimes generate before I think through the problem.
And it makes me ask myself:
Am I using AI to extend my thinking…
or to avoid it?
Because the value was never just the answer.
It was the struggle required to reach it.
I don’t worry about AI becoming smarter than me.
I worry about becoming too dependent on something that isn’t thinking at all.
#AI #CognitiveThinking #ThroughMyQuietLens #SmartPhones #LLMs #StatiscialAverage #AverageThinking